[PATCH 2/2] iommu: add qcom_iommu

[Sricharan]

Hi Rob,

<..>

>>>+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/qcom,iommu.txt
>>>@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
>>>+* QCOM IOMMU Implementation
>>>+
>>>+Qualcomm "B" family devices which are not compatible with arm-smmu have
>>>+a similar looking IOMMU but without access to the global register space.
>>>+This is modelled as separate IOMMU devices which have just a single
>>>+master.
>>>+
>>>+** Required properties:
>>>+
>>>+- compatible    : Should be one of:
>>>+
>>>+                        "qcom,msm8916-iommu-context-bank"
>>>+
>>>+                  depending on the particular implementation and/or the
>>>+                  version of the architecture implemented.
>>>+
>>>+- reg           : Base address and size of the SMMU.  And optionally,
>>>+                  if present, the "smmu_local_base"
>>>+
>>>+- interrupts    : The context fault irq.
>>>+
>>>+- #iommu-cells  : Must be 0
>>>+
>>>+- qcom,iommu-ctx-asid   : context ASID
>>>+
>>>+- qcom,iommu-secure-id  : secure-id
>>>+
>>>+- clocks        : The interface clock (iface_clk) and bus clock (bus_clk)
>>>+
>>>+** Examples:
>>>+
>>>+      mdp_iommu: iommu-context-bank at 1e24000 {
>>>+              compatible = "qcom,msm8916-iommu-context-bank";
>>>+              reg = <0x1e24000 0x1000
>>>+                      0x1ef0000 0x3000>;
>>>+              reg-names = "iommu_base", "smmu_local_base";
>>>+              interrupts = <GIC_SPI 70 0>;
>>>+              qcom,iommu-ctx-asid = <4>;
>>>+              qcom,iommu-secure-id = <17>;
>>
>> This is not an per context bank property and can be programmed for an
>> given iommu only once. So we call qcom_iommu_sec_init for
>> each context bank once, which does not look correct. Similarly for
>> smmu_local_base as well. So should this be handled using an global
>> once for all contexts ?
>
>yeah, smmu_local_base and secure-id would be duplicate for all context
>banks that are part of the same actual iommu.  (But it was Robin's
>suggestion to just model this as separate context-bank devices, since
>we cannot touch the global space).
>
>Did I misunderstand the downstream driver code?  It looked like
>qcom_scm_restore_sec_cfg() was called once on first attach per
>context-bank, not globally for the entire iommu, which is what I'm
>doing with this driver.  But I haven't yet tried to enable other
>context-banks in the apps iommu yet.
>

The downstream driver seems to be calling the sec_cfg once
for an iommu when a context is attached for the first time and not for
the subsequent's contexts that are attached. So, means programmed
only once and not for every context. I see it that way. Anyways when you
add more than context-banks, we can see if that causes trouble..

Regards,
 Sricharan