[PATCH v4 10/18] iommu/mediatek: Add mt8183 IOMMU support
Yong Wu
yong.wu at mediatek.com
Fri Dec 21 08:02:38 UTC 2018
On Fri, 2018-12-21 at 12:43 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 4:42 PM Yong Wu <yong.wu at mediatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > The M4U IP blocks in mt8183 is MediaTek's generation2 M4U which use
> > the ARM Short-descriptor like mt8173, and most of the HW registers
> > are the same.
> >
> > Here list main differences between mt8183 and mt8173/mt2712:
> > 1) mt8183 has only one M4U HW like mt8173 while mt2712 has two.
> > 2) mt8183 don't have the "bclk" clock, it use the EMI clock instead.
> > 3) mt8183 can support the dram over 4GB, but it doesn't call this "4GB
> > mode".
> > 4) mt8183 pgtable base register(0x0) extend bit[1:0] which represent
> > the bit[33:32] in the physical address of the pgtable base, But the
> > standard ttbr0[1] means the S bit which is enabled defaultly, Hence,
> > we add a mask.
> > 5) mt8183 HW has a GALS modules, SMI should enable "has_gals" support.
> > 6) the larb-id in smi-common is remapped. M4U should enable
> > larbid_remapped support.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu at mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h | 1 +
> > drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > index 8ab3b69..d91a554 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> > #include "mtk_iommu.h"
> >
> > #define REG_MMU_PT_BASE_ADDR 0x000
> > +#define MMU_PT_ADDR_MASK GENMASK(31, 7)
> >
> > #define REG_MMU_INVALIDATE 0x020
> > #define F_ALL_INVLD 0x2
> > @@ -54,7 +55,7 @@
> > #define REG_MMU_CTRL_REG 0x110
> > #define F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD BIT(4)
> > #define F_MMU_TF_PROTECT_SEL_SHIFT(data) \
> > - ((data)->plat_data->m4u_plat == M4U_MT2712 ? 4 : 5)
> > + ((data)->plat_data->m4u_plat == M4U_MT8173 ? 5 : 4)
>
> Should the shift value be a member of plat_data instead?
It's also ok.
This TF_PROTECT_SEL MACRO looks a bit complex. I can use a new patch to
refactor it.
>
> > /* It's named by F_MMU_TF_PROT_SEL in mt2712. */
> > #define F_MMU_TF_PROTECT_SEL(prot, data) \
> > (((prot) & 0x3) << F_MMU_TF_PROTECT_SEL_SHIFT(data))
> > @@ -347,7 +348,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > /* Update the pgtable base address register of the M4U HW */
> > if (!data->m4u_dom) {
> > data->m4u_dom = dom;
> > - writel(dom->cfg.arm_v7s_cfg.ttbr[0],
> > + writel(dom->cfg.arm_v7s_cfg.ttbr[0] & MMU_PT_ADDR_MASK,
> > data->base + REG_MMU_PT_BASE_ADDR);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -510,6 +511,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_of_xlate(struct device *dev, struct of_phandle_args *args)
> >
> > static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
> > {
> > + enum mtk_iommu_plat m4u_plat = data->plat_data->m4u_plat;
> > u32 regval;
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -520,7 +522,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
> > }
> >
> > regval = F_MMU_TF_PROTECT_SEL(2, data);
> > - if (data->plat_data->m4u_plat == M4U_MT8173)
> > + if (m4u_plat == M4U_MT8173)
> > regval |= F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD;
> > writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_CTRL_REG);
> >
> > @@ -541,14 +543,14 @@ static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
> > F_INT_PRETETCH_TRANSATION_FIFO_FAULT;
> > writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_INT_MAIN_CONTROL);
> >
> > - if (data->plat_data->m4u_plat == M4U_MT8173)
> > + if (m4u_plat == M4U_MT8173)
> > regval = (data->protect_base >> 1) | (data->enable_4GB << 31);
> > else
> > regval = lower_32_bits(data->protect_base) |
> > upper_32_bits(data->protect_base);
> > writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_IVRP_PADDR);
> >
> > - if (data->enable_4GB && data->plat_data->m4u_plat != M4U_MT8173) {
> > + if (data->enable_4GB && m4u_plat == M4U_MT2712) {
> > /*
> > * If 4GB mode is enabled, the validate PA range is from
> > * 0x1_0000_0000 to 0x1_ffff_ffff. here record bit[32:30].
> > @@ -558,8 +560,11 @@ static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
> > }
> > writel_relaxed(0, data->base + REG_MMU_DCM_DIS);
> >
> > - /* It's MISC control register whose default value is ok except mt8173.*/
> > - if (data->plat_data->m4u_plat == M4U_MT8173)
> > + /*
> > + * It's MISC control register whose default value is ok
> > + * except mt8173 and mt8183.
> > + */
> > + if (m4u_plat == M4U_MT8173 || m4u_plat == M4U_MT8183)
>
> Again, should this be a field in plat_data?
In mt8173 and mt8183, 0x48 is REG_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE while it's
MMU_MISC_CTRL which contain this STANDARD_AXI_MODE bit and some other
bits in the other SoCs.
The register name and meaning are not the same. I guess I can not use a
value like reg_0x48 in plat_data. I'd like to keep the current way. is
it ok?
>
> > writel_relaxed(0, data->base + REG_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE);
> >
> > if (devm_request_irq(data->dev, data->irq, mtk_iommu_isr, 0,
> > @@ -713,6 +718,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_iommu_resume(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct mtk_iommu_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > struct mtk_iommu_suspend_reg *reg = &data->reg;
> > + struct mtk_iommu_domain *m4u_dom = data->m4u_dom;
> > void __iomem *base = data->base;
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -728,8 +734,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_iommu_resume(struct device *dev)
> > writel_relaxed(reg->int_control0, base + REG_MMU_INT_CONTROL0);
> > writel_relaxed(reg->int_main_control, base + REG_MMU_INT_MAIN_CONTROL);
> > writel_relaxed(reg->ivrp_paddr, base + REG_MMU_IVRP_PADDR);
> > - if (data->m4u_dom)
> > - writel(data->m4u_dom->cfg.arm_v7s_cfg.ttbr[0],
> > + if (m4u_dom)
> > + writel(m4u_dom->cfg.arm_v7s_cfg.ttbr[0] & MMU_PT_ADDR_MASK,
> > base + REG_MMU_PT_BASE_ADDR);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -750,9 +756,16 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_iommu_resume(struct device *dev)
> > .has_bclk = true,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct mtk_iommu_plat_data mt8183_data = {
> > + .m4u_plat = M4U_MT8183,
> > + .larbid_remap_enable = true,
> > + .larbid_remapped = {0, 4, 5, 6, 7, 2, 3, 1},
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct of_device_id mtk_iommu_of_ids[] = {
> > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-m4u", .data = &mt2712_data},
> > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-m4u", .data = &mt8173_data},
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-m4u", .data = &mt8183_data},
> > {}
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > index 3877050..6385dec 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ enum mtk_iommu_plat {
> > M4U_MT2701,
> > M4U_MT2712,
> > M4U_MT8173,
> > + M4U_MT8183,
> > };
> >
> > struct mtk_iommu_plat_data {
> > diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> > index 3720c77..bced778 100644
> > --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> > @@ -285,6 +285,12 @@ static void mtk_smi_larb_config_port_gen1(struct device *dev)
> > .larb_special_mask = BIT(8) | BIT(9), /* bdpsys */
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct mtk_smi_larb_gen mtk_smi_larb_mt8183 = {
> > + .has_gals = true,
> > + .config_port = mtk_smi_larb_config_port_gen2_general,
> > + .larb_special_mask = BIT(2) | BIT(3) | BIT(7), /* IPU0 | IPU1 | CCU */
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct of_device_id mtk_smi_larb_of_ids[] = {
> > {
> > .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-smi-larb",
> > @@ -298,6 +304,10 @@ static void mtk_smi_larb_config_port_gen1(struct device *dev)
> > .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-smi-larb",
> > .data = &mtk_smi_larb_mt2712
> > },
> > + {
> > + .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-smi-larb",
> > + .data = &mtk_smi_larb_mt8183
> > + },
> > {}
> > };
> >
> > @@ -391,6 +401,11 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > .gen = MTK_SMI_GEN2,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct mtk_smi_common_plat mtk_smi_common_mt8183 = {
> > + .gen = MTK_SMI_GEN2,
> > + .has_gals = true,
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct of_device_id mtk_smi_common_of_ids[] = {
> > {
> > .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-smi-common",
> > @@ -404,6 +419,10 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-smi-common",
> > .data = &mtk_smi_common_gen2,
> > },
> > + {
> > + .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-smi-common",
> > + .data = &mtk_smi_common_mt8183,
> > + },
> > {}
> > };
> >
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
More information about the iommu
mailing list