[PATCH 0/2] Introduce PCI_FIXUP_IOMMU
zhangfei.gao at linaro.org
Thu May 28 06:46:54 UTC 2020
On 2020/5/28 上午2:18, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 07:49:07PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
>> Some platform devices appear as PCI but are actually on the AMBA bus,
>> and they need fixup in drivers/pci/quirks.c handling iommu_fwnode.
>> Here introducing PCI_FIXUP_IOMMU, which is called after iommu_fwnode
>> is allocated, instead of reusing PCI_FIXUP_FINAL since it will slow
>> down iommu probing as all devices in fixup final list will be
>> reprocessed, suggested by Joerg, 
> Is this slowdown significant? We already iterate over every device
> when applying PCI_FIXUP_FINAL quirks, so if we used the existing
> PCI_FIXUP_FINAL, we wouldn't be adding a new loop. We would only be
> adding two more iterations to the loop in pci_do_fixups() that tries
> to match quirks against the current device. I doubt that would be a
> measurable slowdown.
I do not notice the difference when compared fixup_iommu and fixup_final
since in our platform no other pci fixup is registered.
Here the plan is adding pci_fixup_device in iommu_fwspec_init,
so if using fixup_final the iteration will be done again here.
>> For example:
>> Hisilicon platform device need fixup in
>> drivers/pci/quirks.c handling fwspec->can_stall, which is introduced in 
>> +static void quirk_huawei_pcie_sva(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec;
>> + pdev->eetlp_prefix_path = 1;
>> + fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(&pdev->dev);
>> + if (fwspec)
>> + fwspec->can_stall = 1;
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_IOMMU(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, 0xa250, quirk_huawei_pcie_sva);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_iFIXUP_IOMMU(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, 0xa251, quirk_huawei_pcie_sva);
>>  https://www.spinics.net/lists/iommu/msg44591.html
>>  https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg94559.html
> If you reference these in the commit logs, please use lore.kernel.org
> links instead of spinics.
Got it, thanks Bjorn.
More information about the iommu