[Ksummit-2013-discuss] KS Topic request: Handling the Stable kernel, let's dump the cc: stable tag

Ben Hutchings ben at decadent.org.uk
Tue Jul 16 02:41:26 UTC 2013


On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 22:09 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
[...] 
> > > How important is the stable releases? Are maintainers willing to do a
> > > little more work now to make sure their subsystems work fine in older
> > > kernels? This isn't the same stable as it was 8 years ago.
> > 
> > And that annoys the hell out of some Linux companies who feel that the
> > stable kernels compete with them.  So people working for those companies
> > might not get as much help with doing any additional work for stable
> > kernel releases (this is not just idle gossip, I've heard it directly
> > from management's mouths.)
> 
> Hmm, this is new to me. Really, I thought the whole point of the stable
> releases was to help Linux companies.
[...]

I also heard some managers decided their kernel source packages should
have all the patches squashed together to make them harder to cherry-
pick... could it have been the same company?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Humans are not rational beings; they are rationalising beings.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-2013-discuss/attachments/20130716/d16773c9/attachment.sig>


More information about the Ksummit-2013-discuss mailing list