[Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] ACPI vs DT

Linus Walleij linus.walleij at linaro.org
Mon Jul 22 23:31:31 UTC 2013


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux at roeck-us.net> wrote:

> Using ACPI does not work well for Super-IO chips - the chips are way too complex
> to handle with ACPI (or at least that is how it seems), and the available ACPI
> bindings are too limited. For example, a Super-IO chip may have dozens of
> registers to program sophistitaced fan control. If accessed through ACPI,
> all one can typically do is to turn a fan on or off.

I was more thinking along the lines of atleast defining the base address
or IO-port in the ACPI DSDT, not trying to abstract everything and its
dog. Isn't it possible to just have ACPI provide some basics?

Yours,
Linus Walleij


More information about the Ksummit-2013-discuss mailing list