[Ksummit-discuss] [topic] Richer internal block API
greg at kroah.com
Sun Jun 1 02:34:58 UTC 2014
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 03:44:52PM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On 05/29/2014 04:43 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >...you know how this all works, we don't have to have meetings in order to
> >do design decisions that are "large".
> Perhaps there is something wrong with that approach. Certainly in regards to
> how to bridge the gap between what we now have for logical volume support,
> and what we should have, or what BSD has, that approach is demonstrably a
> perennial failure. After all these years, we still have dm and md as
> separate islands, no usable snapshotting block device, and roughly zero
> interaction between filesystems and volume managers.
People have talked about this for over a very long time. I've seen
Neil give numerous presentations about this for what, a decade now?
It must not be important enough for anyone to actually do the work. Or,
more likely, no one has been able to convince a company to sponsor the
work. So perhaps, it isn't that major of a thing that is needed to be
> The larger issue would be, why is there no design process in Linux for
> large design issues?
There is, an "evolutionary" process. If you take a look at a 4 or 5
year old kernel, major things have happened. It's just that if you are
in the middle of it all, it doesn't look like "large" things have
More information about the Ksummit-discuss