[Ksummit-discuss] Reforming Acked-by (was Re: [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers)
rdunlap at infradead.org
Mon Jun 2 02:43:42 UTC 2014
On 05/30/2014 02:10 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 11:10 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:59:38AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 15:15:14 -0400
>>> "John W. Linville" <linville at tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>>>> I hate to bikeshed this, but "Maintainer-acked-by" seems too long to type...
>>> Yeah, I wouldn't want to type that. What about:
>>> Approved-by: ...
>>> That is reserved for maintainers only?
>> If we need such a tag, I like this verion better.
> OK, it's late here; but for the record, I think Acked-by is perfectly
> clear and we don't need a new tag.
More information about the Ksummit-discuss