[Ksummit-discuss] Reforming Acked-by (was Re: [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers)

NeilBrown neilb at suse.de
Mon Jun 2 02:53:46 UTC 2014


On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 19:43:42 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> wrote:

> On 05/30/2014 02:10 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 11:10 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:59:38AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 15:15:14 -0400
> >>> "John W. Linville" <linville at tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> I hate to bikeshed this, but "Maintainer-acked-by" seems too long to type...
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, I wouldn't want to type that. What about:
> >>>
> >>> Approved-by: ...
> >>>
> >>> That is reserved for maintainers only?
> >>
> >> If we need such a tag, I like this verion better.
> > 
> > Bikeshedded-by:?
> > 
> > Discussed-in-circles-by:?
> > 
> > Maintainer-penguin-pee-blessed-by:?
> > 
> > OK, it's late here; but for the record, I think Acked-by is perfectly
> > clear and we don't need a new tag.
> 
> Acked-by: me
> 
> 

Are you just saying that you agree, or are you affirming this in your status
as MAINTAINER of the documentation?

- Confused

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/attachments/20140602/499e73c6/attachment.sig>


More information about the Ksummit-discuss mailing list