[Ksummit-discuss] Reforming Acked-by (was Re: [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers)

[Randy Dunlap]

On 06/01/2014 07:53 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 19:43:42 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 05/30/2014 02:10 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 11:10 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
>>>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:59:38AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 15:15:14 -0400
>>>>> "John W. Linville" <linville at tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I hate to bikeshed this, but "Maintainer-acked-by" seems too long to type...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I wouldn't want to type that. What about:
>>>>>
>>>>> Approved-by: ...
>>>>>
>>>>> That is reserved for maintainers only?
>>>>
>>>> If we need such a tag, I like this verion better.
>>>
>>> Bikeshedded-by:?
>>>
>>> Discussed-in-circles-by:?
>>>
>>> Maintainer-penguin-pee-blessed-by:?
>>>
>>> OK, it's late here; but for the record, I think Acked-by is perfectly
>>> clear and we don't need a new tag.
>>
>> Acked-by: me
>>
>>
> 
> Are you just saying that you agree, or are you affirming this in your status
> as MAINTAINER of the documentation?
> 
> - Confused
> 

Yes (I agree with James).

-- 
~Randy