[Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] stable issues

Jan Kara jack at suse.cz
Wed May 7 14:15:03 UTC 2014


On Wed 07-05-14 12:06:28, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:58:58PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > I tend to think of LTP as a nice way of doing unit-tests for the uapi.
> > Fengguang's scripts do include it, iirc, but I'm referring more to unit
> > level tests. It serves well for changes in ipc, and should also for
> > other subsystems.
> 
> LTP is too complicated and enterprisey.  With trinity you don't can just
> type:
> 
> 	./configure.sh && make && ./trinity
> 
> With LTP you have to read the install documents.  You can't run it
> from your home directory so you have to build a virtual machine which
> you don't care about before you install it.
  Actually, I'm occasionally using LTP and it doesn't seem too bad to me.
And it seems LTP is improving over time so I'm mostly happy about it.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR


More information about the Ksummit-discuss mailing list