[Ksummit-discuss] Reforming Acked-by (was Re: [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers)
James Bottomley
James.Bottomley at HansenPartnership.com
Fri May 30 21:10:53 UTC 2014
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 11:10 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:59:38AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 May 2014 15:15:14 -0400
> > "John W. Linville" <linville at tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>
> > > I hate to bikeshed this, but "Maintainer-acked-by" seems too long to type...
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, I wouldn't want to type that. What about:
> >
> > Approved-by: ...
> >
> > That is reserved for maintainers only?
>
> If we need such a tag, I like this verion better.
Bikeshedded-by:?
Discussed-in-circles-by:?
Maintainer-penguin-pee-blessed-by:?
OK, it's late here; but for the record, I think Acked-by is perfectly
clear and we don't need a new tag.
James
More information about the Ksummit-discuss
mailing list