[Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Testing
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Tue Jul 7 18:28:14 UTC 2015
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 10:52:04AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 07/07/2015 10:18 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >Off the top of my head the automated ones I'm aware of are Olof's build
> >& boot test, Dan running smatch and I think some other static analysis
> >stuff, someone (not sure who?) running some coccinelle stuff, Coverity
> >and I've got a builder too.
> Plus mine, of course. Only part missing is automated bisect and e-mail
> if something starts failing.
> Which reminds me - do you use buildbot ? I think you are sending automated
> e-mail on failures. It would help me a lot if someone had automated bisect
> and the ability to e-mail results using buildbot to get me started.
No, not me - all my failure reports are lovingly hand crafted using
traditional artisan techniques. Kevin, Tyler and Fengguang have things
but apart from 0day I think everything is still manually triggered.
> Not really sure what to do about it. What turned out to help in the last
> two companies I worked for was automatic revert of broken patches. That
> sounds radical and I dislike it myself, but it helped.
Perhaps that's something we should be discussing? It may be something
that we just evolve a solution for as we proceed though - right now it's
largely theoretical. For -next Stephen will often carry extra patches
that make sense.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/attachments/20150707/ddf815b6/attachment.sig>
More information about the Ksummit-discuss
mailing list