[Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Recruitment (Reviewers, Testers, Maintainers, Hobbyists)
Fengguang Wu
fengguang.wu at intel.com
Sat Jul 11 08:32:13 UTC 2015
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:03:00PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 02:00:59PM -0700, josh at joshtriplett.org wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 10:38:30PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 01:11:27PM -0700, josh at joshtriplett.org wrote:
> > > > Bonus if this is also wired into the 0day bot, so that you also find out
> > > > if you introduce a new warning or error.
> > >
> > > No reason to make bots do stupid work, if we really wanted to consider
> > > this a bit more seriously the pipeline could be:
> > >
> > > mailing-list | coccinelle coccicheck| smatch | sparse | 0-day-bot
> >
> > That would effectively make the bot duplicate part of 0-day. Seems
> > easier to have some way to tell 0-day "if you see obvious procedural
> > issues, don't bother with full-scale testing, just reject".
>
> Yeah true, Fengguang, is that an option?
Never mind, 0-day is powerful enough to do full-scale testing for
early stage branches and expose as much errors as possible in one
iteration.
Thanks,
Fengguang
More information about the Ksummit-discuss
mailing list