[Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Issues with stable process
James Bottomley
James.Bottomley at HansenPartnership.com
Thu Jul 16 09:19:04 UTC 2015
On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 21:25 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:24:10 +1000
> NeilBrown <neilb at suse.com> wrote:
>
> > > I just use the rule of thumb: must be in -next for two days because then
> > > I know 0day (and the other checkers) have also run.
> >
> > Do you *really* know that?
> > Given that there seems to be value in knowing "0day has run
> > successfully", should we ask for an interface to do exactly that?
> >
>
> There's an opt-in with Fengguang Wu's 0day tests to have it email you
> when it finishes with "SUCCESS". I have that, as I don't do pushes for
> any patches until I see that.
How? Is there actually some sort of interface to 0day? (/me has been
rather lazy and simply emails requests to Fengguang). Detail would be
great to share.
James
More information about the Ksummit-discuss
mailing list