[Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Addressing complex dependencies and semantics (v2)
arnd at arndb.de
Fri Aug 5 09:01:43 UTC 2016
On Thursday, August 4, 2016 9:59:30 PM CEST Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:20 AM, Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 11:50:49AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> >> Nope, it doesn't work that way, sorry.
> >> Nice try, just unwind your initialization properly
> > Deferred probe is probably the best thing that ever happened for the
> > quality of kernel error handling
> Now we just need a way to force testing of the remove functions.
Hmm, instead of calling just 'probe', we might first call probe,
then remove, then probe again as a compile-time option.
What could possibly go wrong? ;-)
More information about the Ksummit-discuss