[Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] GPL defense issues
Wolfram Sang
wsa at the-dreams.de
Sun Aug 28 07:48:54 UTC 2016
> everyone just gets why. Take a certain Russian company as an example.
> When I joined, that company really fancied permissive licences.
> However, it also feared releasing code that its competition would then
> use against it in the market. The give back clause of the GPL has a
> solid answer to this (your competition has to show you the code they
> would compete with you on),
Here is the core question of consequences for non-compliance again:
What if the competition doesn't want to show the code? Were you able to
advertise a "don't sue" approach to that company?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/attachments/20160828/715782f4/attachment.sig>
More information about the Ksummit-discuss
mailing list