[Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] kernel unit testing
Alex Shi
alex.shi at linaro.org
Wed Jul 13 22:23:57 UTC 2016
On 07/14/2016 04:59 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Alex Shi <alex.shi at linaro.org
> <mailto:alex.shi at linaro.org>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 07/13/2016 06:07 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 01:48:15PM +0900, Alex Shi wrote:
>
> I am thinking if it's possible to share an basic tree
> which include some
> widely wanted backporting features. That could share the
> testing and review,
> then will reduce bugs much more.
>
> Like LTSI already does today? :)
>
>
> It looks we share some basic ideas on backporting part. But
> industry need much more backporting features. and new features
> which out of upstream aren't started from here, since it's a
> upstream quality without more eyes in community.
>
>
> If you want more eyes AND more backporting, how about you move ahead
> to the newer version instead? In the end, if you'll backport most of
> the code you end up with close to the same code base.
>
> Doing security and minimal security fixes on -stable is a very
> different endeavor than creating downstream trees full of feature
> backports.
>
> (We only care about a few features, you might say -- but once you join
> up with others, who care about a few but different features, you'll
> eventually end up approximating the kernel from which you're
> backporting all these features).
>
It highly depends the new feature backporting criteria, like the current
LTSI, there are no much feature backportings as its claimed.
Alex
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/attachments/20160714/0475a9f9/attachment.html>
More information about the Ksummit-discuss
mailing list