[Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] stable workflow

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:48:34 +0530
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at intel.com> wrote:

> But the person might be slightly better off than you or me :-)
> 

I still believe that it comes down to the maintainer making the final
decision about marking a patch as stable. If they don't have the
hardware to test it, then they should then ask the patch submitter to
test for stable. If the submitter doesn't want to for whatever reason,
then that patch simply shouldn't be marked for stable.

-- Steve