[Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] stable workflow
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Fri Jul 29 16:48:42 UTC 2016
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:06:52PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Well, I don't think there's any answer to that. But I still think it's
> better than nothing. If nobody has the hardware, do we ever care if it
> gets tested? ;-)
I think it'd be better to split such tests out so that there's a clear
distinction between those that we can tell should run reliably and those
that have some hardware dependency. That way people who just want a
predicatable testsuite without worrying if there's something wrong in
the environment can get one.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/attachments/20160729/c3383e75/attachment.sig>
More information about the Ksummit-discuss
mailing list