[Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Developing across multiple areas of the kernel

Mark Brown broonie at sirena.org.uk
Fri Jul 14 16:20:25 UTC 2017


On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 06:51:42PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 04:05:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Trees can be added to kernelci, yes.  Another approach would be to work
> > out a workflow with the upstreams that makes this better, if they'd take
> > pull requests for example.

> Isn't the goal of this topic in maintainers summit? Improving workflows :)

It's also the goal here!

> So, my way to overcome my issues was to add "parallel" tree and to stop
> crying about "long queues".

So I guess what everyone is suggesting here is changing this from being
a parallel tree to a tree that's part of the normal workflow for this
code.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/attachments/20170714/e998e755/attachment.sig>


More information about the Ksummit-discuss mailing list