[Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk redesign

[Andrew Lunn]

> I was under the impression that we do this anyway; even ATM every line
> in the printk buffer is prefixed with a timestamp.

What is the granularity of the timestamp? I'm talking about where
every second or third line is a printk of some sort. It could be some
of them are existing _err(), some are added _dbg() etc. Is the
timestamp sufficient to put such output back into order?

	  Andrew