[Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Bug-introducing patches

Stephen Rothwell sfr at canb.auug.org.au
Tue Sep 11 00:47:07 UTC 2018


Hi Steve,

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:46:38 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> Honestly, I think this is something that Linus should yell at
> maintainers for. I treat my pushes into linux-next the same as I treat
> my pull requests to Linus. I don't push anything into next until it's
> been fully run through my test suite, and passes. That also makes it
> easier for me to know that whatever I have in next is also ready for
> Linus (the way it was suppose to be).

I am pretty sure that Linus does not follow linux-next (except to see
what is still coming during the merge window), so maybe I should be
yelling at people - but yelling is not one of my better skills :-)

In the current particular case it is runtime testing that is failing
and I only do a small amount of that (and it is not failing for me).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/attachments/20180911/0f1eabdd/attachment.sig>


More information about the Ksummit-discuss mailing list