[Lf_carrier] CGL and the Linux Foundation
mika.kukkonen at nsn.com
mika.kukkonen at nsn.com
Mon May 14 20:43:18 PDT 2007
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lf_carrier-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org
>[mailto:lf_carrier-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org] On
>Behalf Of ext John Cherry
(...)
>I'm not sure if these are NTT specific, but TIPC was rejected by the
>kernel community for quite some time. Other projects that have not
>gotten traction in the kernel community include live patching and boot
>image fallback.
>
>TIPC was critical for high availability IPC. It is actually the
>backbone of a couple of clustering solutions as well.
Umm, John fails to explicitly mention here, that _TIPC_ now is in
the Linux kernel, and has been a while. So it is one of the few
successes actually.
>Live patching is a servicability/availability requirement makes it
>possible to patch a binary while the system is running. This is
>important for online updates with zero downtime.
I do not think these will ever get mainlined to the kernel, as they
are so intrusive and of little value to the "normal" (PC) user. But
I have seen, that some distro vendors are pretty OK in maintaining
these in their trees, so I do not think this is so bad situation.
>Boot image fallback provides a way to quickly and gracefully back out
>changes. There are a plethora of issues with this and coming up with a
>solution that is acceptable to all has been difficult.
Kexec() has been mainlined, what else you need? :-)
--MiKu
More information about the Lf_carrier
mailing list