[Lightning-dev] Atomic swap

Pierre pm+lists at acinq.fr
Mon Sep 14 21:44:26 UTC 2015

> Caveats:
> 1) We still need some way of adding another anchor to a channel, since
>    the atomic swap can't increase channel *capacity*.

Yes. I think updating channel capacity is maybe less important for now, but
that's just my opinion.

> 2) This is a routing question :)

Huh ?

> So, they're normal HTLCs, but the "next hop" is not "lightning node X"
> but "bitcoin address X".

Riiiight ! Awesome
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150914/f46419d8/attachment.html>

More information about the Lightning-dev mailing list