[Lightning-dev] Atomic swap
Pierre
pm+lists at acinq.fr
Mon Sep 14 21:44:26 UTC 2015
> Caveats:
> 1) We still need some way of adding another anchor to a channel, since
> the atomic swap can't increase channel *capacity*.
Yes. I think updating channel capacity is maybe less important for now, but
that's just my opinion.
> 2) This is a routing question :)
Huh ?
> So, they're normal HTLCs, but the "next hop" is not "lightning node X"
> but "bitcoin address X".
Riiiight ! Awesome
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150914/f46419d8/attachment.html>
More information about the Lightning-dev
mailing list