[Lightning-dev] BOLT #2: wire protocol: YA acknowledgement change.
rusty at rustcorp.com.au
Mon May 23 21:26:00 UTC 2016
Pierre <pm+lists at acinq.fr> writes:
> I like it! Let's hope it will suit everyone and we can converge on
> something soon.
> FWIW I was able to independently implement a toy version of the
> protocol and pass your scripted tests [*] so I guess there are no
> obvious issues (duh). Maybe it could be the first step towards a LN
> nonreg test set?
Great! That's a really good idea. Eventually I'd like to have some
"canned conversations" to go with the BOLTs for testing against.
> Just one thing about the "nocommitwait", I wonder why you make it
> optional in your test: why would you forbid the sending of two
> successive commits, given that the more permissive approach is
> perfectly well defined?
Because it's a little simpler if you don't let yourself do multiple
in-flight commits. You only need one set of outstanding changes, rather
than keeping them for every commit. This code makes doubly-sure that is
true (it is true in my C implementation).
> PS: what does YA mean?
Yet Another. I found a pretty good description on Wikipedia:
Among programmers, yet another (often abbreviated ya, Ya or YA in the
initial part of an acronym) is an idiomatic qualifier in the name of a
computer program, organisation, or event that is confessedly
Stephen C. Johnson is credited with establishing the naming convention
in the late 1970s when he named his compiler-compiler yacc (Yet
Another Compiler-Compiler), since he felt there were already numerous
compiler-compilers in circulation at the time.
More information about the Lightning-dev