[Lightning-dev] Lightning-dev Digest, Vol 28, Issue 9

Rusty Russell rusty at rustcorp.com.au
Sat Dec 16 18:55:01 UTC 2017


Stan Kladko <stan.kladko at galacticexchange.io> writes:
>> If you have a reason to open a channel to an arbitrary node, then other nodes have a reason to open a channel to an arbitrary node, which might be you.  Even if the network grows large, that > also means there are more participants who might decide, via whatever heuristic, to channel to your node.
>
> If I am connected to some nodes, but no one connected to me, then all
> of my deposit is used by me only, and is not used by other nodes.
> If I am routing nodes through my node, then it can potentially
> negatively affect availability of my deposit for my own transactions.
> So it seems to me that the best strategy is to connect but accept no
> incoming connections.
>
> How much real is this problem?

I don't think it is.  If you have two channels, then people routing
through you doesn't effect your total capacity, it just shifts them
between the channels.

Hope that helps,
Rusty.


More information about the Lightning-dev mailing list