[Lightning-dev] Base AMP
decker.christian at gmail.com
Tue Dec 4 11:40:00 UTC 2018
Which brings us back to the initial proposal that just signals the
awareness of a temporary underpayment with the single "more is coming"-bit.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 11:49 PM Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com> writes:
> > But what if 2 of those paths fail?
> > It would be better to merge them into a single payment along the
> expensive 4th path.
> > However, the remaining succeeding path has already given `numpaths`=3.
> > Using `numpaths` overcommits to what you will do in the future, and is
> unnecessary anyway.
> > The payee is interested in the total value, not the details of the split.
> Excellent point.
> Lightning-dev mailing list
> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Lightning-dev