[Lightning-dev] Link-level payment splitting via intermediary rendezvous nodes

ZmnSCPxj ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com
Fri Nov 9 11:32:27 UTC 2018


Good morning Johan,

> C must also make sure the detour route stays within the fee limit of course.

This is indeed quite correct.  Contrariwise, if the detour route charges a fee that is even just 0.001 satoshi lower than the fee that C would charge, then it would still be rational to make this attempt: there is a nonzero change to earn 0.001 satoshi, whereas the alternative (fail the route) earns C 0 fees.

Another issue, is that the by inserting the switch-ephemeral-keys hop packet, a hop packet at the end may be pushed off, and C cannot know this.  However, the same argument applies: the alternative is earning 0 fees.

Christian Decker pointed out that the D->C->A cycle could be rebalanced so that the C<->D link could pass the payment through.  However, this has the slight disadvantage.  If the route actually terminates to a payee further off at F, and it fails between F and E, then C has already paid for the rebalancing.  Using this technique, C neither earns nor loses money.

This also increases the anonymity set, of rendez-vous routing.  A rendez-vous supporting node may be used, not for rendez-vous, but instead, this link-level payment rerouting.

Regards,
ZmnSCPxj
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20181109/5c3ff072/attachment.html>


More information about the Lightning-dev mailing list