[Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] checkpatch: add fix option for MISSING_SIGN_OFF
Lukas Bulwahn
lukas.bulwahn at gmail.com
Tue Nov 10 14:00:52 UTC 2020
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 2:06 PM Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Currently checkpatch warns us if there is no 'Signed-off-by' line
> for the patch.
>
> E.g., running checkpatch on commit 9ac060a708e0 ("leaking_addresses:
> Completely remove --version flag") reports this error:
>
> ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
>
> Provide a fix by adding a Signed-off-by line corresponding to the author
> of the patch before the patch separator line. Also avoid this error for
> the commits where some typo is present in the sign off.
>
> E.g. for commit 8cde5d5f7361 ("bus: ti-sysc: Detect omap4 type timers
> for quirk") we get missing sign off as well as bad sign off for:
>
> Siganed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>
>
> Here it is probably best to give BAD_SIGN_OFF warning for Non-standard
> signature and avoid MISSING_SIGN_OFF
>
> Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe at perches.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421 at gmail.com>
> ---
> This patch was made after applying https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/20201108100632.75340-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.com/
> and my last changes at https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/20201108134317.25400-1-yashsri421@gmail.com/
>
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index cb46288127ac..2deffd0c091b 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2404,6 +2404,8 @@ sub process {
>
> my $last_blank_line = 0;
> my $last_coalesced_string_linenr = -1;
> + my $patch_separator_linenr = 0;
> + my $non_standard_signature = 0;
>
> our @report = ();
> our $cnt_lines = 0;
> @@ -2755,6 +2757,10 @@ sub process {
> if ($line =~ /^---$/) {
> $has_patch_separator = 1;
> $in_commit_log = 0;
> + # to add missing sign off line before diff(s)
> + if($patch_separator_linenr == 0) {
> + $patch_separator_linenr = $linenr;
Well are you sure linenr is correct? (As I wrote, I do not know, but
you should know.)
I think you would need to create a patch for testing your feature
where multiple things are fixed within the same patch and then check
if the fix is added at the right place.
> + }
> }
>
> # Check if MAINTAINERS is being updated. If so, there's probably no need to
> @@ -2775,6 +2781,9 @@ sub process {
> if ($sign_off !~ /$signature_tags/) {
> WARN("BAD_SIGN_OFF",
> "Non-standard signature: $sign_off\n" . $herecurr);
> +
> + # to avoid missing_sign_off error as it most probably is just a typo
> + $non_standard_signature = 1;
The variable name now sounds much better.
> }
> if (defined $space_before && $space_before ne "") {
> if (WARN("BAD_SIGN_OFF",
> @@ -7118,9 +7127,12 @@ sub process {
> "Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch\n");
> }
> if ($is_patch && $has_commit_log && $chk_signoff) {
> - if ($signoff == 0) {
> - ERROR("MISSING_SIGN_OFF",
> - "Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)\n");
> + if ($signoff == 0 && !$non_standard_signature) {
> + if (ERROR("MISSING_SIGN_OFF",
> + "Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)\n") &&
> + $fix) {
> + fix_insert_line($patch_separator_linenr - 1, "Signed-off-by: $author");
> + }
> } elsif ($authorsignoff != 1) {
> # authorsignoff values:
> # 0 -> missing sign off
> --
> 2.17.1
>
More information about the Linux-kernel-mentees
mailing list