[PATCH v3 2/2] usbip: eliminate duplicate code in vhci_device_unlink_cleanup

Anirudh Rayabharam mail at anirudhrb.com
Fri Aug 13 18:25:08 UTC 2021


The cleanup code for unlink_tx and unlink_rx lists is almost the same.
So, extract it into a new function and call it for both unlink_rx and
unlink_tx.

Signed-off-by: Anirudh Rayabharam <mail at anirudhrb.com>
---
 drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c | 57 ++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
index 6f3f374d4bbc..b142508b46ce 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
@@ -945,7 +945,8 @@ static int vhci_urb_dequeue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, int status)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(struct vhci_device *vdev)
+static void vhci_cleanup_unlink_list(struct vhci_device *vdev,
+		struct list_head *unlink_list)
 {
 	struct vhci_hcd *vhci_hcd = vdev_to_vhci_hcd(vdev);
 	struct usb_hcd *hcd = vhci_hcd_to_hcd(vhci_hcd);
@@ -956,46 +957,15 @@ static void vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(struct vhci_device *vdev)
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&vhci->lock, flags);
 	spin_lock(&vdev->priv_lock);
 
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(unlink, tmp, &vdev->unlink_tx, list) {
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(unlink, tmp, unlink_list, list) {
 		struct urb *urb;
 
-		/* give back urb of unsent unlink request */
-		pr_info("unlink cleanup tx %lu\n", unlink->unlink_seqnum);
-
-		urb = pickup_urb_and_free_priv(vdev, unlink->unlink_seqnum);
-		if (!urb) {
-			pr_info("the urb (seqnum %lu) was already given back\n",
-				unlink->unlink_seqnum);
-			list_del(&unlink->list);
-			kfree(unlink);
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		urb->status = -ENODEV;
-
-		usb_hcd_unlink_urb_from_ep(hcd, urb);
-
-		list_del(&unlink->list);
-
-		spin_unlock(&vdev->priv_lock);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags);
-
-		usb_hcd_giveback_urb(hcd, urb, urb->status);
-
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&vhci->lock, flags);
-		spin_lock(&vdev->priv_lock);
-
-		kfree(unlink);
-	}
-
-	while (!list_empty(&vdev->unlink_rx)) {
-		struct urb *urb;
-
-		unlink = list_first_entry(&vdev->unlink_rx, struct vhci_unlink,
-			list);
-
-		/* give back URB of unanswered unlink request */
-		pr_info("unlink cleanup rx %lu\n", unlink->unlink_seqnum);
+		if (unlink_list == &vdev->unlink_tx)
+			pr_info("unlink cleanup tx %lu\n",
+					unlink->unlink_seqnum);
+		else
+			pr_info("unlink_cleanup rx %lu\n",
+					unlink->unlink_seqnum);
 
 		urb = pickup_urb_and_free_priv(vdev, unlink->unlink_seqnum);
 		if (!urb) {
@@ -1027,6 +997,15 @@ static void vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(struct vhci_device *vdev)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags);
 }
 
+static void vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(struct vhci_device *vdev)
+{
+	/* give back URB of unsent unlink request */
+	vhci_cleanup_unlink_list(vdev, &vdev->unlink_tx);
+
+	/* give back URB of unanswered unlink request */
+	vhci_cleanup_unlink_list(vdev, &vdev->unlink_rx);
+}
+
 /*
  * The important thing is that only one context begins cleanup.
  * This is why error handling and cleanup become simple.
-- 
2.26.2



More information about the Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list