[PATCH v8 7/7] drm: remove drm_file.master_lookup_lock
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Thu Aug 26 13:21:30 UTC 2021
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 10:01:22AM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote:
> Previously, master_lookup_lock was introduced in
> commit 0b0860a3cf5e ("drm: serialize drm_file.master with a new
> spinlock") to serialize accesses to drm_file.master. This then allowed
> us to write drm_file_get_master in commit 56f0729a510f ("drm: protect
> drm_master pointers in drm_lease.c").
>
> The rationale behind introducing a new spinlock at the time was that
> the other lock that could have been used (drm_device.master_mutex) was
> the outermost lock, so embedding calls to drm_file_get_master and
> drm_is_current_master in various functions easily caused us to invert
> the lock hierarchy.
>
> Following the conversion of master_mutex into a rwsem, and its use to
> plug races with modesetting rights, we've untangled some lock
> hierarchies and removed the need for using drm_file_get_master and the
> unlocked version of drm_is_current_master in multiple places.
>
> Hence, we can take this opportunity to clean up the locking design by
> replacing master_lookup_lock with drm_device.master_rwsem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx at gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c | 19 +++++++------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> include/drm/drm_file.h | 9 +--------
> 6 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
> index f2b2f197052a..232416119407 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
> @@ -61,10 +61,9 @@
> * trusted clients.
> */
>
> -static bool drm_is_current_master_locked(struct drm_file *fpriv)
> +bool drm_is_current_master_locked(struct drm_file *fpriv)
> {
> - lockdep_assert_once(lockdep_is_held(&fpriv->master_lookup_lock) ||
> - lockdep_is_held(&fpriv->minor->dev->master_rwsem));
> + lockdep_assert_held_once(&fpriv->minor->dev->master_rwsem);
>
> return fpriv->is_master && drm_lease_owner(fpriv->master) == fpriv->minor->dev->master;
> }
> @@ -83,9 +82,9 @@ bool drm_is_current_master(struct drm_file *fpriv)
> {
> bool ret;
>
> - spin_lock(&fpriv->master_lookup_lock);
> + down_read(&fpriv->minor->dev->master_rwsem);
Looking at the 3 patches and the need to have a locked version of pretty
much everything I'm wondering: Can't we just drop the spinlock completely,
and everywhere we've taking it thus far replace it with a
lockdep_assert_held_once?
The thing is, if there's any path left that doesn't hold the rwsem in at
least read mode we have a bug. And the right way to fix such a bug is to
grab the rwsem sufficiently high up in the callchain. That way I think we
should be able to avoid all these tedious changes to everything, including
touching i915 and vmwgfx drivers.
Or am I missing something big time?
-Daniel
> ret = drm_is_current_master_locked(fpriv);
> - spin_unlock(&fpriv->master_lookup_lock);
> + up_read(&fpriv->minor->dev->master_rwsem);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -120,7 +119,7 @@ int drm_authmagic(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> DRM_DEBUG("%u\n", auth->magic);
>
> down_write(&dev->master_rwsem);
> - if (unlikely(!drm_is_current_master(file_priv))) {
> + if (unlikely(!drm_is_current_master_locked(file_priv))) {
> up_write(&dev->master_rwsem);
> return -EACCES;
> }
> @@ -178,9 +177,7 @@ static int drm_new_set_master(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *fpriv)
> new_master = drm_master_create(dev);
> if (!new_master)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - spin_lock(&fpriv->master_lookup_lock);
> fpriv->master = new_master;
> - spin_unlock(&fpriv->master_lookup_lock);
>
> fpriv->is_master = 1;
> fpriv->authenticated = 1;
> @@ -343,9 +340,7 @@ int drm_master_open(struct drm_file *file_priv)
> if (!dev->master) {
> ret = drm_new_set_master(dev, file_priv);
> } else {
> - spin_lock(&file_priv->master_lookup_lock);
> file_priv->master = drm_master_get(dev->master);
> - spin_unlock(&file_priv->master_lookup_lock);
> }
> up_write(&dev->master_rwsem);
>
> @@ -413,13 +408,13 @@ struct drm_master *drm_file_get_master(struct drm_file *file_priv)
> if (!file_priv)
> return NULL;
>
> - spin_lock(&file_priv->master_lookup_lock);
> + down_read(&file_priv->minor->dev->master_rwsem);
> if (!file_priv->master)
> goto unlock;
> master = drm_master_get(file_priv->master);
>
> unlock:
> - spin_unlock(&file_priv->master_lookup_lock);
> + up_read(&file_priv->minor->dev->master_rwsem);
> return master;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_file_get_master);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
> index 90b62f360da1..8c846e0179d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,6 @@ struct drm_file *drm_file_alloc(struct drm_minor *minor)
> init_waitqueue_head(&file->event_wait);
> file->event_space = 4096; /* set aside 4k for event buffer */
>
> - spin_lock_init(&file->master_lookup_lock);
> mutex_init(&file->event_read_lock);
>
> if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_GEM))
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> index 17f3548c8ed2..5d421f749a17 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ int drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> struct drm_file *filp);
>
> /* drm_auth.c */
> +bool drm_is_current_master_locked(struct drm_file *fpriv);
> int drm_getmagic(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> struct drm_file *file_priv);
> int drm_authmagic(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> index 8bea39ffc5c0..c728437466c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static int drm_setversion(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *f
> int if_version, retcode = 0;
>
> down_write(&dev->master_rwsem);
> - if (unlikely(!drm_is_current_master(file_priv))) {
> + if (unlikely(!drm_is_current_master_locked(file_priv))) {
> retcode = -EACCES;
> goto unlock;
> }
> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static int drm_ioctl_permit(u32 flags, struct drm_file *file_priv)
>
> /* MASTER is only for master or control clients */
> if (unlikely((flags & DRM_MASTER) &&
> - !drm_is_current_master(file_priv)))
> + !drm_is_current_master_locked(file_priv)))
> return -EACCES;
>
> /* Render clients must be explicitly allowed */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c
> index 15bf3a3c76d1..0eecf320b1ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c
> @@ -498,12 +498,12 @@ int drm_mode_create_lease_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> return PTR_ERR(lessee_file);
>
> down_read(&dev->master_rwsem);
> - if (unlikely(!drm_is_current_master(lessor_priv))) {
> + if (unlikely(!drm_is_current_master_locked(lessor_priv))) {
> ret = -EACCES;
> goto out_file;
> }
>
> - lessor = drm_file_get_master(lessor_priv);
> + lessor = lessor_priv->master;
> /* Do not allow sub-leases */
> if (lessor->lessor) {
> DRM_DEBUG_LEASE("recursive leasing not allowed\n");
> @@ -565,7 +565,6 @@ int drm_mode_create_lease_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> /* Hook up the fd */
> fd_install(fd, lessee_file);
>
> - drm_master_put(&lessor);
> up_read(&dev->master_rwsem);
> DRM_DEBUG_LEASE("drm_mode_create_lease_ioctl succeeded\n");
> return 0;
> @@ -600,7 +599,8 @@ int drm_mode_list_lessees_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> - lessor = drm_file_get_master(lessor_priv);
> + lockdep_assert_held_once(&dev->master_rwsem);
> + lessor = lessor_priv->master;
> DRM_DEBUG_LEASE("List lessees for %d\n", lessor->lessee_id);
>
> mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
> @@ -624,7 +624,6 @@ int drm_mode_list_lessees_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> arg->count_lessees = count;
>
> mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
> - drm_master_put(&lessor);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -650,7 +649,8 @@ int drm_mode_get_lease_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> - lessee = drm_file_get_master(lessee_priv);
> + lockdep_assert_held_once(&dev->master_rwsem);
> + lessee = lessee_priv->master;
> DRM_DEBUG_LEASE("get lease for %d\n", lessee->lessee_id);
>
> mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
> @@ -678,7 +678,6 @@ int drm_mode_get_lease_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> arg->count_objects = count;
>
> mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
> - drm_master_put(&lessee);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -703,11 +702,11 @@ int drm_mode_revoke_lease_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> down_write(&dev->master_rwsem);
> - if (unlikely(!drm_is_current_master(lessor_priv))) {
> + if (unlikely(!drm_is_current_master_locked(lessor_priv))) {
> ret = -EACCES;
> goto unlock;
> }
> - lessor = drm_file_get_master(lessor_priv);
> + lessor = lessor_priv->master;
> mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
>
> lessee = _drm_find_lessee(lessor, arg->lessee_id);
> @@ -728,7 +727,6 @@ int drm_mode_revoke_lease_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
>
> fail:
> mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
> - drm_master_put(&lessor);
>
> unlock:
> up_write(&dev->master_rwsem);
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h
> index d12bb2ba7814..e2d49fe3e32d 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_file.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h
> @@ -227,16 +227,12 @@ struct drm_file {
> * @master:
> *
> * Master this node is currently associated with. Protected by struct
> - * &drm_device.master_rwsem, and serialized by @master_lookup_lock.
> + * &drm_device.master_rwsem.
> *
> * Only relevant if drm_is_primary_client() returns true. Note that
> * this only matches &drm_device.master if the master is the currently
> * active one.
> *
> - * To update @master, both &drm_device.master_rwsem and
> - * @master_lookup_lock need to be held, therefore holding either of
> - * them is safe and enough for the read side.
> - *
> * When dereferencing this pointer, either hold struct
> * &drm_device.master_rwsem for the duration of the pointer's use, or
> * use drm_file_get_master() if struct &drm_device.master_rwsem is not
> @@ -248,9 +244,6 @@ struct drm_file {
> */
> struct drm_master *master;
>
> - /** @master_lock: Serializes @master. */
> - spinlock_t master_lookup_lock;
> -
> /** @pid: Process that opened this file. */
> struct pid *pid;
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Linux-kernel-mentees
mailing list