[PATCH] ecryptfs: fix incorrect kernel-doc comment syntax in files

[Randy Dunlap]

On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, Aditya Srivastava wrote:

> The opening comment mark '/**' is used for kernel-doc comments.
> There are files in fs/encrypts which follows this syntax, but the content
> inside does not comply with kernel-doc.
> This causes unexpected warnings from kernel-doc.
>
> E.g., header comment for fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c follows kernel-doc syntax
> for comments(i.e., '/**'), but the content inside does not.
>
> Running kernel-doc -none on fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c causes these
> unexpected warnings:
> "warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc format:  * ecryptfs_d_revalidate - revalidate an ecryptfs dentry"
> "warning: Function parameter or member 'dentry' not described in 'ecryptfs_d_revalidate'"
> "warning: Function parameter or member 'flags' not described in 'ecryptfs_d_revalidate'"
> "warning: expecting prototype for eCryptfs(). Prototype was for ecryptfs_d_revalidate() instead"
>
> Similarly for other files too.
>
> Provide a simple fix by replacing such occurrences with general comment
> format, i.e. '/*', to prevent kernel-doc from parsing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421 at gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org>

Thanks.

> ---
> * Applies perfectly on next-20210312
>
> fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c          |  2 +-
> fs/ecryptfs/debug.c           |  2 +-
> fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c          |  2 +-
> fs/ecryptfs/ecryptfs_kernel.h |  2 +-
> fs/ecryptfs/file.c            |  2 +-
> fs/ecryptfs/inode.c           |  2 +-
> fs/ecryptfs/keystore.c        |  6 +++---
> fs/ecryptfs/kthread.c         |  2 +-
> fs/ecryptfs/main.c            | 10 +++++-----
> fs/ecryptfs/messaging.c       |  2 +-
> fs/ecryptfs/miscdev.c         |  2 +-
> fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c            |  6 +++---
> fs/ecryptfs/read_write.c      |  2 +-
> fs/ecryptfs/super.c           |  2 +-
> 14 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>