[PATCH -next v3] docs: document all error message types in checkpatch
Dwaipayan Ray
dwaipayanray1 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 22 07:43:13 UTC 2021
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:03 PM Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 12:26 PM Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > All the error message types now have a verbose description.
> >
> > Also there are two new groups of message types:
> >
> > - Macros, Attributes and Symbols
> > - Functions and Variables
> >
> > Rearrange the message types to fit these new groups as needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1 at gmail.com>
>
> Let us go for a wider review on linux-doc and lkml...
>
Sure will do
> Reviewed-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn at gmail.com>
>
>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Add more explanation for LOCKDEP
> > - Minor grammar fixes
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Replace 4.10 kernel doc links by latest
> >
> > Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst | 319 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 281 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
> > index 2671e54c8320..904fd5fe2484 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
> > @@ -280,43 +280,12 @@ API usage
> > However this is not always the case (See signal.h).
> > This message type is emitted only for includes from arch/.
> >
> > - **ARRAY_SIZE**
> > - The ARRAY_SIZE(foo) macro should be preferred over
> > - sizeof(foo)/sizeof(foo[0]) for finding number of elements in an
> > - array.
> > -
> > - The macro is defined in include/linux/kernel.h::
> > -
> > - #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0]))
> > -
> > **AVOID_BUG**
> > BUG() or BUG_ON() should be avoided totally.
> > Use WARN() and WARN_ON() instead, and handle the "impossible"
> > error condition as gracefully as possible.
> > See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#bug-and-bug-on
> >
> > - **AVOID_EXTERNS**
> > - Function prototypes don't need to be declared extern in .h
> > - files. It's assumed by the compiler and is unnecessary.
> > -
> > - **AVOID_L_PREFIX**
> > - Local symbol names that are prefixed with `.L` should be avoided,
> > - as this has special meaning for the assembler; a symbol entry will
> > - not be emitted into the symbol table. This can prevent `objtool`
> > - from generating correct unwind info.
> > -
> > - Symbols with STB_LOCAL binding may still be used, and `.L` prefixed
> > - local symbol names are still generally usable within a function,
> > - but `.L` prefixed local symbol names should not be used to denote
> > - the beginning or end of code regions via
> > - `SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL`/`SYM_CODE_END`
> > -
> > - **BIT_MACRO**
> > - Defines like: 1 << <digit> could be BIT(digit).
> > - The BIT() macro is defined in include/linux/bitops.h::
> > -
> > - #define BIT(nr) (1UL << (nr))
> > -
> > **CONSIDER_KSTRTO**
> > The simple_strtol(), simple_strtoll(), simple_strtoul(), and
> > simple_strtoull() functions explicitly ignore overflows, which
> > @@ -325,6 +294,25 @@ API usage
> > correct replacements.
> > See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#simple-strtol-simple-strtoll-simple-strtoul-simple-strtoull
> >
> > + **LOCKDEP**
> > + The lockdep_no_validate class was added as a temporary measure to
> > + prevent warnings on conversion of device->sem to device->mutex.
> > + It should not be used for any other purpose.
> > + See: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1268959062.9440.467.camel@laptop/
> > +
> > + **MALFORMED_INCLUDE**
> > + The #include statement has a malformed path. This has happened
> > + because the author has included a double slash "//" in the pathname
> > + accidentally.
> > +
> > + **USE_LOCKDEP**
> > + lockdep_assert_held() annotations should be preferred over
> > + assertions based on spin_is_locked()
> > + See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/locking/lockdep-design.html#annotations
> > +
> > + **UAPI_INCLUDE**
> > + No #include statements in include/uapi should use a uapi/ path.
> > +
> >
> > Comment style
> > -------------
> > @@ -353,7 +341,6 @@ Comment style
> > See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#commenting
> >
> >
> > -
> > Commit message
> > --------------
> >
> > @@ -397,6 +384,35 @@ Commit message
> > source patch.
> > See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin
> >
> > + **DIFF_IN_COMMIT_MSG**
> > + Avoid having diff content in commit message.
> > + This causes problems when one tries to apply a file containing both
> > + the changelog and the diff because patch(1) tries to apply the diff
> > + which it found in the changelog.
> > + See: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20150611134006.9df79a893e3636019ad2759e@linux-foundation.org/
> > +
> > + **GERRIT_CHANGE_ID**
> > + To be picked up by gerrit, the footer of the commit message might
> > + have a Change-Id like::
> > +
> > + Change-Id: Ic8aaa0728a43936cd4c6e1ed590e01ba8f0fbf5b
> > + Signed-off-by: A. U. Thor <author at example.com>
> > +
> > + The Change-Id line must be removed before submitting.
> > +
> > + **GIT_COMMIT_ID**
> > + The proper way to reference a commit id is:
> > + commit <12+ chars of sha1> ("<title line>")
> > +
> > + An example may be::
> > +
> > + Commit e21d2170f36602ae2708 ("video: remove unnecessary
> > + platform_set_drvdata()") removed the unnecessary
> > + platform_set_drvdata(), but left the variable "dev" unused,
> > + delete it.
> > +
> > + See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
> > +
> >
> > Comparison style
> > ----------------
> > @@ -426,6 +442,148 @@ Comparison style
> > side of the test should be avoided.
> >
> >
> > +Macros, Attributes and Symbols
> > +------------------------------
> > +
> > + **ARRAY_SIZE**
> > + The ARRAY_SIZE(foo) macro should be preferred over
> > + sizeof(foo)/sizeof(foo[0]) for finding number of elements in an
> > + array.
> > +
> > + The macro is defined in include/linux/kernel.h::
> > +
> > + #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0]))
> > +
> > + **AVOID_EXTERNS**
> > + Function prototypes don't need to be declared extern in .h
> > + files. It's assumed by the compiler and is unnecessary.
> > +
> > + **AVOID_L_PREFIX**
> > + Local symbol names that are prefixed with `.L` should be avoided,
> > + as this has special meaning for the assembler; a symbol entry will
> > + not be emitted into the symbol table. This can prevent `objtool`
> > + from generating correct unwind info.
> > +
> > + Symbols with STB_LOCAL binding may still be used, and `.L` prefixed
> > + local symbol names are still generally usable within a function,
> > + but `.L` prefixed local symbol names should not be used to denote
> > + the beginning or end of code regions via
> > + `SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL`/`SYM_CODE_END`
> > +
> > + **BIT_MACRO**
> > + Defines like: 1 << <digit> could be BIT(digit).
> > + The BIT() macro is defined in include/linux/bitops.h::
> > +
> > + #define BIT(nr) (1UL << (nr))
> > +
> > + **CONST_READ_MOSTLY**
> > + When a variable is tagged with the __read_mostly annotation, it is a
> > + signal to the compiler that accesses to the variable will be mostly
> > + reads and rarely(but NOT never) a write.
> > +
> > + const __read_mostly does not make any sense as const data is already
> > + read-only. The __read_mostly annotation thus should be removed.
> > +
> > + **DATE_TIME**
> > + It is generally desirable that building the same source code with
> > + the same set of tools is reproducible, i.e. the output is always
> > + exactly the same.
> > +
> > + The kernel does *not* use the ``__DATE__`` and ``__TIME__`` macros,
> > + and enables warnings if they are used as they can lead to
> > + non-deterministic builds.
> > + See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/kbuild/reproducible-builds.html#timestamps
> > +
> > + **DEFINE_ARCH_HAS**
> > + The ARCH_HAS_xyz or ARCH_HAVE_xyz patterns are totally wrong.
> > +
> > + For big conceptual features use Kconfig symbols instead. And for
> > + smaller things where we have compatibility fallback functions but
> > + want architectures able to override them with optimized ones one
> > + function at a time, we should either use weak functions (appropriate
> > + for some cases), or the symbol that protects them should the
> > + SAME SYMBOL WE USE.
>
> Capital letter means SHOUTING. I do not see the need to shout here...
>
> Maybe that was needed in the original mail... in the documentation, we
> are happy that the reader reads it at all...
>
Yes that makes sense. We don't wanna scare our readers too. So i will
correct this.
Thanks!
Dwaipayan.
More information about the Linux-kernel-mentees
mailing list