[llvmlinux] [GSoC] Status report

[Marcelo Sousa]

Hello,

When I tried to use the optimizer on the bytecode files produced during the
kernel compilation, opt failed in about about 300 modules.
Eduard: did you encounter this issue at any stage of your project?

Regards,
Marcelo


On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Jan-Simon Moeller <
jsmoeller at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> It should be enough to run
>  clang --analyze on the preprocessed source on the links above.
>
> It will eat up all your memory produce no object file ;) .
>
> The original file in the linux kernel is arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.c
>
> Best,
> JS
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:15 AM, PaX Team <pageexec at freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>> On 5 Aug 2013 at 12:01, Eduard Bachmakov wrote:
>>
>> > 3.1 I'm currently running delta to reduce the original test case down
>> > from about 20,000 lines. I got to about 1,500. I keep on pushing but
>> > laptop overheat is slowing me down a bit ;-).
>> > If you want to try for yourself/help me out/give advice:
>> > - Original input: http://bpaste.net/show/120181/
>> > - Reduced case for now: http://bpaste.net/show/120132/
>> > I will follow up with a bug number once I get the test case small
>> enough.
>>
>> could you perhaps post the exact clang command line to reproduce this?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVMLinux mailing list
>> LLVMLinux at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/llvmlinux
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVMLinux mailing list
> LLVMLinux at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/llvmlinux
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/llvmlinux/attachments/20130806/d275f4f4/attachment-0001.html>