[llvmlinux] Multiple storage class error

Behan Webster behanw at converseincode.com
Sun Nov 17 21:30:52 UTC 2013

On 11/17/13 12:38, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 17 November 2013 20:15, Behan Webster <behanw at converseincode.com
> <mailto:behanw at converseincode.com>> wrote:
>     Though both groups of people will have more impact in the
>     embedded, and mobile uses of the kernel. Much of the
>     server/cloud/Enterprise guys still need to be convinced that clang
>     is worth trying. But we're getting there...
> Hey, don't count ARM out of the server space, yet!
My apologies. I hadn't intended to. :)

Though I still think the mind share around ARM is in the areas that I
mentioned. ;)

>  Calxeda, HP, AMD, Facebook and others are working hard to deliver
> very dense ARM64 rack boxes. And they're responsible for a lot of the
> testing and patches going on at the moment via Linaro, so, if we get
> Linaro on the LLVM train, we'll get a lot of people in...
That would certainly be very cool. And good to know.


Behan Webster
behanw at converseincode.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/llvmlinux/attachments/20131117/b6cb8313/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the LLVMLinux mailing list