[llvmlinux] Proposal for new naming convention to targets

Tinti viniciustinti at gmail.com
Wed Jan 15 17:31:00 UTC 2014

I am only suggesting "vendor"/"flavor"/"subsystem" is because normally AOSP
uses one kernel, Cyanogenmod uses another, Linaro uses another and by my
experiences the patches do not apply in this case.

It may happen with Yocto too.

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Behan Webster <behanw at converseincode.com>wrote:

> On 01/15/14 08:42, Charlebois, Mark wrote:
> > Would it be better just to create a top level directory for arch? ARM,
> AArch64, x86, x86_64? I am not sure -linux- or -android- adds much value
> unless we are supporting multiple user spaces per target.
> I don't think he's referring to userspace as much as "vendor".
> Behan
> --
> Behan Webster
> behanw at converseincode.com
> _______________________________________________
> LLVMLinux mailing list
> LLVMLinux at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/llvmlinux

Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/llvmlinux/attachments/20140115/31e1e8a4/attachment.html>

More information about the LLVMLinux mailing list