[llvmlinux] Can alloca() be used in the kernel instead of VLAIS or VLA?
David Woodhouse
dwmw2 at infradead.org
Mon Feb 2 20:04:15 UTC 2015
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 20:28 +0100, Behan Webster wrote:
>
> > The real reason we don't use alloca() in the kernel is because the
> > kernel has very limited stack space.
> That makes sense.
>
> Though for a similarly sized piece of memory you would allocate as an
> automatic variable, wouldn't alloca then also be okay?
You might possibly think that. It might even seem logical.
But alloc() screams "HAHA I AM ALLOCATING VARIABLY-SIZED STUFF ON THE
STACK. LOOK AT ME. WHAT BOUNDS ARE THERE ON THE SIZE OF THIS OBJECT?" in
a way that VLAIS does not.
So if you're "fixing" the VLAIS, sometimes you might get prodded to fix
it *differently* rather than just changing it to alloca().
Might be worth a try though.
--
dwmw2
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5745 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/llvmlinux/attachments/20150202/aee88f0c/attachment.bin>
More information about the LLVMLinux
mailing list