Form XSB, take some load off LSB.
Marcin Krol
lug at btweng.krakow.pl
Thu Nov 26 04:28:20 PST 1998
On Thu, 26 Nov 1998, imrana wrote:
> >I totally agree... If I may suggest, I would say that maybe a "XSB"
> >should be formed, separate from "LSB" and the "XSB" can be a "layer"
> >added onto the top of the "LSB" at a later date.
> By the help of this thread it is becoming more clearer that there is a need
> for XSB (or whatever you call. Perhaps a name more "GUI"ish may be more
> appropriate.)
1. There is more than desktop issue here, it is about linux
and common ground in higher OS levels. Something like:
-------------
App config,
desktop, and lots
of other hl things
(High Level
Interoperability
Group or something
like that)
-------------
Libs and other
software found
in every distr
(LSB)
-------------
Kernel
(Linus and co.)
-------------
2. Call it anything but "standard" - this word triggers <whatever
wm there is> proponent to dig up their nuke launch codes. :-)
Marcin Krol
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hiroshima 45 Tschernobyl 86 Windows 95
More information about the lsb-discuss
mailing list