File Systems.
Nicholas Petreley
nicholas at petreley.com
Fri Mar 17 14:11:16 PST 2000
* gk4 at us.ibm.com (gk4 at us.ibm.com) [000317 06:44]:
>
> In general, I like the idea of /opt for non-essential post-installed
> packages and /usr/local for system admin built/install stuff. I would
> like be able to install new packages all day long in my 20GB /opt and not
> have to worry about / or /usr
That's how it works in the FHS 2.0 spec, which is what I thought we were
adopting (or 2.1, or whatever).
While I think discussion about these issues is always healthy, it does worry
me that we're still arguing about something that should be a no-brainer by
now. If the LSB doesn't produce a usable spec soon, it won't matter how
perfect that spec may be - ISVs want to produce their software for Linux
(vs. specific distros) *now*. How long do you think it will be before ISVs
and other developers give up on the LSB and consider us irrelevant? That
would be a crime much greater than whatever one thinks about /usr/bin vs.
/opt/package.
-Nick
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-discuss-request at lists.linuxbase.org
> with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster at lists.linuxbase.org
>
>
--
**********************************************************
Nicholas Petreley LinuxWorld - InfoWorld
nicholas at petreley.com - http://www.petreley.com - Eph 6:12
**********************************************************
.
More information about the lsb-discuss
mailing list