Shoot me now
aj at azure.humbug.org.au
Tue May 2 20:07:50 PDT 2000
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 07:32:07PM -0400, Erik Troan wrote:
> On Tue, 2 May 2000, Nicholas Petreley wrote:
> > Wrapper scripts are the way to go, I guess, but then
> > you're still talking about what shell will execute
> > the wrapper. Which means we define which shells must
> > exist on the system, right?
#!/bin/sh will exist on the system. It'll be at least POSIX compliant.
Making /bin/bash also exist on the system might not be a bad idea, either.
This is all already covered in Debian's policy document, btw.
Anthony Towns <aj at humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG encrypted mail preferred.
``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
We believe in: rough consensus and working code.''
-- Dave Clark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 350 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/attachments/20000503/d82a15cd/attachment.pgp
More information about the lsb-discuss