Packaging and installation

Nicholas Petreley nicholas at petreley.com
Mon Oct 23 16:13:02 PDT 2000


* Bodo Bauer (bb at turbolinux.com) [001023 16:04]:
> Eric S. Raymond (esr at thyrsus.com) wrote:
> > Nicholas Petreley <nicholas at petreley.com>:
> > > Instead, we should define an installation protocol that
> > > looks for programs and libraries within the filesystem
> > > itself in order to detect if dependencies are met.
> > 
> > Nick, I think this is a case where the search for perfection is far less
> > important that getting a solution in place that does 90% of the job and
> > can evolve to do 100%.
> 
> I (as an ex Zenguin guy...:) agree with Eric. We have RPM and it works well 
> in most of the cases. A 100% solution is too much of a dream to become 
> reality any time soon. And quite frankly I don't know if I'd like to 
> have one and only one package format. Competition is good and it drives
> technology (see Gnome/KDE... :).

Huh?  One of my main points was that a protocol approach
allows you to use any package format.  
 
-Nick

-- 
**********************************************************
Nicholas Petreley   Caldera Systems - LinuxWorld/InfoWorld
nicholas at petreley.com - http://www.petreley.com - Eph 6:12
**********************************************************
.




More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list