Password aging in passwd, differing chfn implementations
cyeoh at samba.org
Mon Feb 25 17:46:03 PST 2002
At 2002/2/25 20:35-0500 Matt Wilson writes:
> Two things:
> It looks as though the passwd(1) section of the LSB was written
> against shadow-utils passwd.
> There are two competing implementations: util-linux chfn and
> shadow-utils chfn.
Thats correct. At the 2001 NY LSB Workgroup meeting it was agreed that
where there was a conflict between a command implemented by util-linux
and shadow-utils the shadow-utils version would be used.
cyeoh at au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
More information about the lsb-discuss