LSB1.1: /proc/cpuinfo

Michael Stone mstone at
Fri Jan 4 06:25:35 PST 2002

On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 01:34:07AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> BTW: sorry for being off topic but does anybody know how to write a test that 
> finds that GNU rm is not UNIX-98 compliant?
> From
> 4.If the current file is a directory, rm will perform actions equivalent to the 
> XSH specification rmdir() function called with a pathname of the current file 
> used as the path argument.
> ... but GNU rm has a -d option that makes it behave like the unlink command.

If you use an out-of-standard option, why would you expect a
standards-compliant result? 

Mike Stone

More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list