LSB1.1: /proc/cpuinfo
Stuart Anderson
anderson at metrolink.com
Fri Jan 4 08:38:09 PST 2002
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> The LSB doesn't define what happens when you use a command or library
> function that is not in the LSB. If you use glibc internal functions you
> will get burned (especially if the folks trying to replace glibc with
> something much lighter actually succeed)
>From Chapter 1: Definitions.
Non-LSB-Compliant Application
An application which has been written to include system routines, commands, or
other resources not included in this document, or which has been compiled into
a format different from those specified here, or which does not behave as
specified in this document.
This sort of says it, though in an indirect way.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson anderson at metrolink.com
Metro Link Incorporated South Carolina Office
5807 North Andrews Way 129 Secret Cove Drive
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Lexington, SC 29072
voice: 954.660.2500 voice: 803.951.3630
http://www.metrolink.com/ XFree86 Core Team
More information about the lsb-discuss
mailing list