Gnome, KDE, and other large application packages

David Pashley david at davidpashley.com
Wed Jul 3 01:58:31 PDT 2002


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 03 July 2002 2:39 am, Collins wrote:
> How does the lfs recommend handling large application packages that
> need to have multiple concurrent incompatible versions?  It is not
> obvious from the standard what would be the best course of action.
>
> Is it recommended/permitted to put these in /opt/kde2, /opt/kde3,
> /opt/gnome, etc.?
>
> kde in particular is a poor candidate for the /usr hierarchy since it
> contains editable configuration files all over the place, and the /usr
> hierarchy is supposed to be read-only.
>
Debian manages to have KDE 3 without having configuration files in /usr. 
Admittedly /usr/share/config is a symlink to /etc/kde3, but only because we 
haven't changed the source. Any other files are not likely to be edited by 
the user (XML UI files etc). 

> Placing these packages in /opt does mean, of course, that other
> smaller independant packages in the /usr hierarchy will be dependant
> on kde/gnome packages in the /opt hierarchy.  Is this considered bad
> form?
>
> What is your opinion?
>
> Thanks,

- -- 
David Pashley
david at davidpashley.com
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9Iry6YsCKa6wDNXYRAvIxAJ40i0Y+AoXntSQ6e4H6G/rcTjfSQQCfUoUt
UWp1vYCkP37yG2mnfUCYIyk=
=5csn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-discuss-request at lists.linuxbase.org
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster at lists.linuxbase.org




More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list