[lsb-futures] Re: Configuration File Spec part of LSB?

Anthony Towns aj at azure.humbug.org.au
Sun Jul 14 23:31:30 PDT 2002


On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 03:44:58PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> 2)  Try to convince Debian to adopt this scheme.  (Be prepared for
> nasty politics.)

You know, considering how much time and effort it took to get the uid of
bin changed in the LSB spec, I don't think that remark is particularly
fair.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj at humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 350 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/attachments/20020715/957036b2/attachment.pgp 


More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list