extension of lsb packages

Jason Gunthorpe jgg at debian.org
Sun Mar 3 22:42:15 PST 2002

On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Jim Knoble wrote:

> My point was that 'lsb-blah-ththth.lsb' is rather redundant.  Either
> call packages 'lsb-blah-ththth.rpm' or 'blah-ththth.lsb'.  Both is too
> much.

Well, the leading lsb- is because that is the name of the package, the
trailing .lsb is because that is the file format.

We could possibly have non-lsb packages using the lsb format, particularly
if the lsb format becomes something more than it is..


More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list