[lsb-discuss] Developing for LSB

Tom Howard tomhoward at users.sourceforge.net
Sun Jun 22 17:03:54 PDT 2003


On Sunday 22 June 2003 18:08, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> Apologies for the slow reply. I think its probably better that we
> standardise the output of individual options -i, -d, -r, -c, etc
> (saying one line of output per option) rather than -s.

I just looked at the patch you sent in and noticed that it doesn't actually 
specify the format of the line as it is outputed.  This means that various 
implementations could output

LSB_VERSION:1.3

or

1.3

or

LSB=1.3

Cheers,

-- 
Tom Howard

Yahoo: bjandtomau
ICQ: 270792190





More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list