[lsb-discuss] Packaging group

Dan Kegel dank at kegel.com
Thu Mar 6 11:36:40 PST 2003

Mike Hearn wrote:
> I think a suitable first goal would be to work towards improving the LSB
> RPM system, so it can tackle dependancies (a lot of work in and of
> itself).

That's a tall order.  First you have to get people to agree
that dependencies are a good thing :-)
Then it's worth discussing who controls the package namespace;
once we have dependencies, we probably need package names to
be globally unique.  (Don't want Joe's libnet confused with Fred's
libnet if they're not compatible!)
- Dan

Dan Kegel

More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list