[lsb-discuss] Re: PROPOSAL: /opt/<provider>/<package>/]
Gerhard Muntingh
gerhardm at muntingh.tmfweb.nl
Fri May 30 03:05:45 PDT 2003
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:51:24AM -0600, Bart Whiteley wrote:
> Also, I would prefer that configuration data be allowed to
> be in /etc/opt/<provider>/<something>, where <something>
> does not necessarily correspond to a "package". Similar
> arguments apply here. Perhaps there are some configuration
> files that are used by a lot of "packages".
Why not a configuration package?
> This fourth rule covers init and cron scripts, as well as other
> things not currently covered in the specification (like
> /etc/logrotate.d/<provider>-*).
I think logrotate should be patched to use /etc/opt/logrotate.d/ also
if it exists. And ofcourse the same for cron and init.
Just thought,
Gerhard.
More information about the lsb-discuss
mailing list